48 COR 40-8395 [¶23,101R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code § 6614 (2021) – Even if Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may …
48 COR 40-8390 [¶23,099R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code § 6614 (2021) – Even if Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may …
48 COR 40-8393 [¶23,100R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code § 6614 (2021) – Even if Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may …
48 COR 40-8379 [¶23,093R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code § 6614 (2021) – Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may rule on …
48 COR 40-8371 [¶23,088R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code § 6614 (2021) – Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may rule on …
Judith S. Freyman, Board Member. Marvin P. Kropke, Board Member. Background. The Division issued one citation to Employer, which timely appealed. The violation was classified as serious, accident-related. Proposed penalties …
48 COR 40-8363 [¶23,084R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORY Labor Code § 6614 (2021) – Employer’s petition for reconsideration raised questions of law, which the Appeals Board may rule …
47 COR 40-8345 [¶23,075R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTERLOCUTORYLabor Code §§ 6614, 6616 (2020) – Employer’s petition for reconsideration was interlocutory, and the Appeals Board denied it for that …