ZADNA

46 COR 40-8221 [¶22,991R] PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION – VERIFICATION AND SERVICE Labor Code §§ 6616, 6619 (2019) – Employer did not verify its petition or provide proof of service on … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »

PEARL CROP, INC.

46 COR 40-8180 [¶22,960R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Labor Code § 6614(a) (2019) – The Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction to grant Employer’s untimely petition for reconsideration. JURISDICTION – PETITION … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »

AMERISK ENGINEERING CORP.

46 COR 40-8089 [¶22,891R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Labor Code § 6614(a) (2018) – The Board lacked jurisdiction to grant Employer’s untimely petition for reconsideration. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »

ACAPULCO POLISHING CORPORATION

46 COR 40-8083 [¶22,885R] PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION – SERVICE Labor Code § 6619 (2018) – Employer’s proof of service was deficient because it did not not demonstrate that the petition … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »

CONCEPT CONSULTANT, INC.

45 COR 40-8023 [¶22,843R] PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION – SERVICE Labor Code § 6619 (2018) – Employer failed to comply with the service requirements for its petition for reconsideration. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »

LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC.

45 COR 40-7986 [¶22,815R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Labor Code § 6614(a) (2018) – The Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction over Employer’s untimely petition. Digest of COSHAB’s Denial of Petition … Read More »

This content is only available to premium subscribers. Please login here log in

Read More »