28 COR 40-4321 [19,981R]
AERIAL DEVICES - FALL PROTECTION
CAL. CODE REGS, tit. 8, 1621(a), 1624(a) and 1629(a)(3) (2001) - Employer's aerial device was in general violation of three safety orders because the runway an employee stepped from it onto was of inadequate width and had no railings, and the break in elevation exceeded 18 inches. The Appeals Board rejected Employer's argument that the cited Construction Safety Orders did not apply.
---
Digest of COSHAB's Decision After Reconsideration dated February 27, 2001, Docket Nos. 96-R1D3-3335 and 3336.
Bill Duplissea and Marcy V. Saunders, Members.
The Appeals Board affirmed the ALJ decision of
Read More...