Digest of COSHAB's decision dated January 19, 1976, Docket No. 75-R5D1-102. Harold Mitchell, Chairman; Ford B. Ford, Member. Jonah Lebell, Hearing Officer.
Guardrails, General. Appellant, engaged in constructing buildings, lost one appeal and won the other.
1636(b): "The evidence presented by the Division was uncontroverted that the rope used as a guardrail had not been re-tightened and sagged to between 2 and 3 feet from floor level between posts. This height is not considered a reasonably level position within the meaning of Section 1636(b) of the Code. The evidence also established that the slack in the guardrail was no longer required for unload
Read More...