Prop. 65/Hcs Hearing Involves Much More Than Msds (Part 2)

By: Cal-OSHA

SAN FRANCISCO - EPICURE Y: The judge noted that the amicus brief singled this out. The product has not been manufactured since April 1991. Chanler asked when the last sale was made. He said it's a statute of limitations question.Landfair said the judge previously ruled that, for Prop. 65, the statute of limitations is one year. "We do not concede that the issue is when was the product sold." The product was sold under the Shell label and with the Shell MSDS, he said. Shell gave Pacific Anchor the formu

Read More...

This content is for premium subscribers. To read please login or subscribe below.

Subscribe Log In