49 COR 40-9081 [¶23,408R] JURISDICTION – PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §6614(a) – The Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction to grant reconsideration over Employer’s untimely petition for reconsideration. Digest of COSHAB’s Denial of Petition for Reconsideration dated May 29, 2026, Inspection No. 1859532. Ed Lowry, Chair. Judith S. Freyman, Board Member. …
49 COR 40-9081 [¶23,409R] JURISDICTION – GOOD CAUSE Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §6601 – Employer failed to establish good cause for its late appeal, which was the result of internal operating problems. Digest of COSHAB’s Denial of Petition for Reconsideration dated May 29, 2026, Inspection No. 1864915. Ed Lowry, Chair. Judith S. …
49 COR 40-9082 [¶23,410R] JURISDICTION – GOOD CAUSE Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §6601 – Employer failed to establish good cause for its late appeal, which was the result of internal operating problems. Digest of COSHAB’s Denial of Petition for Reconsideration dated June 4, 2026, Inspection No. 1853969. Ed Lowry, Chair. Judith S. …
49 COR 40-9077 [¶23,406] INJURY AND ILLNESS PRevention PROGRAM – Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §1509(a) The proffered evidence showed the Division did not establish a failure to implement periodic inspections or an IIPP procedure for identifying and evaluating hazards. SECURE DECKING – Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §1710(l)(5)(A) The proffered evidence showed …
49 COR 40-9079 [¶23,407] WILLFUL CLASSIFICATION – Title 8, Cal. Code of Regulations, §334(e) The proffered evidence showed the Employer consciously and knowingly violated §§341(c)(1)(A) and 1630(a). AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES – The proffered evidence showed the Employer failed to establish that its violation of §1630(a) was excused by unusual site conditions or structural configurations, or by …
49 COR 40-9075 [¶23,405R] ORDER – INTERLOCUTORY Labor Code §6614 – Employer’s Petition was interlocutory in nature because the order from which it sought reconsideration, the granting of the Division’s Motion to Amend Citation, was not a final order. The Board denied Employer’s Petition. Digest of COSHAB’s Decision After Reconsideration dated May 21, 2026, Inspection …
49 COR 40-9075 [¶23,404R] ORDER – INTERLOCUTORY Labor Code §6614 – Employer’s petition was interlocutory in nature because the order from which it sought reconsideration, the granting of the Division’s Motion to Amend Citation, was not a final order. The Board denied the petition for reconsideration. Digest of COSHAB’s Decision After Reconsideration dated May 19, …
49 COR 40-9071 [¶23,403] INJURY AND ILLNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM – Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §3203(b)(1) The proffered evidence showed the Division did not establish a violation of record-keeping requirements. HAZARDOUS ENERGY CONTROL – Title 8, California Code of Regulations, §3314(g) The proffered evidence showed the Division did not establish a violation of written …