Digest of COSHAB's decision dated April 13, 1976, Docket No. 75-R4D4-854. Gerald Winerman, Administrative Law Judge.
There was no violation of 1509(a). The evidence established that Appellant did inaugurate and maintain an accident prevention program in that tailgate meetings were held, the general superintendent inspected the site, hard hats were used, and jobsite posters were posted in the construction shack.
A nonserious violation of 1621(a) was established. Regarding the building under construction, railings were not provided on the open sides and ends of the first, second and third floors for a period of two weeks; nor were railings ever provide
Read More...