Digest of COSHAB-ALJ's decision dated June 14, 1976, Docket No. 75-R5D1-718. Jonah Lebell, Administrative Law Judge.
[1] Fire Extinguisher, to be Immediately Accessible---[2] Penalties, Reasonableness, Appellant Lacking Good Safety Attitude [Repeat Violation]. This appeal was denied. The alleged repeat/nonserious violation of 1743(j) and the proposed penalty of $75 were affirmed.
The safety engineer ". . . observed one of appellant's employees using a plumber's torch, which is a pressurized fuel device, to install copper piping through a wooden stud wall. Appellant's employee did not have a dry chemical or carbon dioxide fire extinguisher at the wo
Read More...