Digest of COSHAB-ALJ's decision dated July 19, 1976, Docket No. 75-R4D3-1115. Adolf Loeb, Administrative Law Judge.
[1] Guarding, Nip Points, Calenders alleged serious violation affirmed nonserious]---[2] Serious vs. Nonserious Violation. This appeal established the existence of three nonserious violations. It was granted to the extent that violation of 4580(c) had originally been alleged serious. In consideration of its reclassification to nonserious, the $650 penalty proposed was reduced and affirmed at $175. The abatement for this item was reasonable only for those machines, as per 4580(c), being fed by hand. For calenders fed by mechanical means,
Read More...