Digest of COSHAB-ALJ's decision dated November 18, 1976, Docket Nos. 76-R4D4-553 and 554. Gerald Winerman, Administrative Law Judge.
[1] Scaffolding, Incompleted, Not Evidence of Improperly Supervised Erection---[2] Electrical, High Voltage, Exposure to Hazard, Minimum Distances [six feet vs. 10 feet] [1764, 1768 construed]. This appeal was granted. The alleged nonserious violation of 1637(i) and the alleged serious violation of 1768 and the related penalties totaling $560 were each set aside.
(1) "Section 1637(i) requires the erection of scaffolding to be under the supervision of a man with proper experience and attitude for securing a safe install
Read More...